Last week, a bunch of my friends and I decided to jump on the train and go to the Philadelphia Museum of Art. A little day trip with friends that I usually meet to go running, and we decided to do something else together. It was fun just to have fun. We were all of the same mind that we were there to enjoy the museum and see as much of it as we felt like seeing, and then go back home. Amtrak tickets were three times as much money to return to New York from Philadelphia as they were to go there, so oddly enough, it was much cheaper to be in an Uber, and that provided a lot more flexibility. But that's not the subject of this blog post.
I went to museums a lot with my kids. And when you do that, it's about the kids, not the museum, so it was fun to go with adults. When you slow down, you get to look at stuff. Notice things. And I think that's kind of the point of an art museum.
If one were to ask what my favorite piece of art was, I would say that Still Life with a Tortoise came up as number one. It was up on the floor with all the old European portraits. And I turned a corner and came upon this surprise. At first, it looked like a collection of stuff that a kid would put together on the beach. But then I noticed that the things didn't go together very well. It turns out it's a still life of a collection of a gentleman's accumulated stuff. Kind of the three hundred year old version of anybody's junk drawer. Possibly by Thomas Black
My other favorite piece of art was this one to the right. Listening to the unexpected , by Yeonmi Kang. Maybe I should have taken another picture, but it was on a shelf with other objects that were all 300 years older than it and were the kind of things that royalty would wear as jewelry. I like the way it stood out from the crowd, and I like the way it looks.
There was a section of the museum entitled "Bathing," and this painting was featured in it. I stopped to look at it because it was quite disturbing. I was somewhat relieved to see that I wasn't the only one who thought that. The first words in its description are: "In this strange and unsettling work..." If you Google Leon Fredericks, the source of life, the first item that comes up is a blog describing it as the worst painting they've ever seen what impressed me the most was that this was 135 years old. I didn't think people were that fucked up back then.
A few years ago, when my daughter started art school, I wanted to understand modern art a little better. What Are You Looking At was recommended to me as something that would give me an introduction to that. But it turned out it was more like a textbook for juniors in art college, and I didn't have the background to really continue reading it. So I only read the first third of it. But the first third of it was about the urinal.
I had forgotten about the urinal until I saw pictures of it in the Philadelphia Museum of Art. The last third of our time there was spent looking for it, following the arrows towards the urinal. When we got to the spot where the arrows all led to, it wasn't there. We found out it was on tour, and it was in New York. It turns out they're all replicas anyway.
![]() |
if you just take a minute to look at this thing, this thing that you've seen reproduced many times before, you notice that Vincent van Gogh only signed his first name. Updating my blog to add something. Because after I shared this with the people that I went to Philadelphia with, one of my friends sent me this picture that he took of me when I wasn't looking. He probably overheard me saying that I wouldn't mind babysitting for that kid. He looks like the kind of kid that I wouldn't mind teaching how to play checkers or something. Or maybe a kid who is anxious to learn how to play checkers . And if you might have noticed, for all the pictures that I posted here, I also took a picture of the description of the art. That was kind of my plan as I walked around the museum, but it never occurred to me that I was going to post this picture. But I am pretty impressed with what Google can do in just a minute.So it's Paul Cezanne's Boy in Red Vest. But it's not... It is Portrait of Master Bunbury AI is pretty good until it's not. |


.jpeg)























